What is the Bitcoin halving? Bitcoin miners are rewarded for verifying new blocks on the network, essentially securing the network. For this, they are paid in BTC, currently 6.25 BTC per block verified plus transaction fees. It takes about 10 minutes to verify a new block so there are roughly 144 blocks verified every day…
Bitcoin miners are rewarded for verifying new blocks on the network, essentially securing the network. For this, they are paid in BTC, currently 6.25 BTC per block verified plus transaction fees. It takes about 10 minutes to verify a new block so there are roughly 144 blocks verified every day which equates to rewards of 900 BTC each day. Thus, the supply of BTC increases by this amount daily.
For every 210,000 blocks mined, the mining reward gets halved. So, instead of a miner receiving 6.25 BTC they will get 3.125 BTC for verifying a block. This will reduce the new BTC daily supply to about 450 BTC.
There are various sources that cite the value of daily BTC transactions. Taking exchange volume only, the recent range is from $20bn to $60bn (let’s be conservative and call this $30bn/day). At current rates (BTC = $70,000), the reduced new supply will equal $31.5m, or roughly 1% of the average daily exchange traded volume, down from a previous 2%.
Miners, however, may not sell all their new coins. Research from CoinShares (1) suggests that the cost of mining a Bitcoin after the halving will be around $40K depending on many variables. So, miners whose operational costs are less than the current market rate may choose to hold their coin and not bring it to market. However, this was always the case. You have some miners that sell all the rewarded BTC when they get it (either to take profit, cover operational costs or for capital investment) and others who hold excess Bitcoin in the expectation of price appreciation.
Another consideration is the ‘free float’ (coins actively trading) in BTC. Currently circa 93.5% or 19.635m of all BTC has been mined. Of that, about 75% (2) is considered to be in long-term hold (where BTC has been sitting in a wallet for longer than 155 days) depending on the variable used for time. This would leave a free float of 5m BTC with the supply increasing by 0.01% daily.
Also, to consider are the new BTC ETFs. The average daily inflow volume into the new ETFs (including grayscale outflows) is $202m (3). This is far more influential on prices than the reduction in supply of $29m
Whilst it is obvious that a decrease in the supply should be net positive for the price of any commodity, this should also be true for Bitcoin. The question is, how much should it increase by and has the increase in price already been built into the current price. As we have seen with the ETF announcements, most pre-determined headlines become ‘buy the rumour, sell the fact’ events and we see a risk of that here too.
We don’t find value in looking back on previous halvings, as there are not enough data points to be statistically meaningful. Additionally, trying to extrapolate correlations to halvings in an instrument that has gone up from $0 to $70K in a short period of time is difficult.
A much larger influence on the price of Bitcoin will be the ETF flows as these have the potential to dramatically change depending on sentiment. These flows can easily outsize the reduction in supply from the halving.
We see the halving as having a much larger impact on miners than the price of Bitcoin. Miners will have to adjust their operations to accommodate the smaller rewards they will get, whether that is by capital expenditure on more efficient equipment, cutting operational costs, or indeed selling more of their mined Bitcoin.
One of the goals for participants in the digital asset space is to increase institutional adoption. A reduction of $29m daily new supply in a market that already transacts $30bio is relatively trivial. If the market cannot handle a reduction of $29m daily supply, then the market is not ready for institutions.
Look out for the ETF flows; they will dictate the price more so than a small decrease in the supply growth.
(2) https://chainexposed.com/SthVsLthSupply.html
(3) https://farside.co.uk/?p=997
(4) https://messari.io/project/bitcoin/charts/market/chart/real-vol
This story covers three topics. First, as markets evolve, they often see a wave of new entrants who are subject to lower regulatory requirements than the incumbents, sometimes known as ‘regulatory arbitrage’.
Cryptoasset markets are often thought of as innovative, which is true in some cases, but not all. Slow processes and regulation can certainly be frustrating, but market participants should always be careful to not be blinded by neophilia, or a love of novelty.
The Ethereum merge, completed in September, transitioned the blockchain’s consensus mechanism from an energy-intensive proof-of-work (POW) to a proof-of-stake (POS) protocol. This has reduced energy consumption by more than 99.9%.1
Zodia Markets is proud to announce its signing of the Armed Forces Covenant, demonstrating its commitment to treat fairly those who serve, or have served in the military, and their families, and emphasising the company’s dedication to fulfilling its social responsibilities.
Brian McGleenon 14 June 2024·4-min read BlackRock (BLK) is leading the charge in the mass tokenisation of real-world assets on blockchains, according to Zodia Markets Ireland chair Michael Walsh.
The deal will strengthen Zodia Markets’ over-the-counter business while allowing Elwood to conentrate on its software-as-a-service activities.
The Securities and Exchange Commission is expected to follow the strategy employed in approving spot bitcoin exchange-traded funds for spot Ethereum ETFs, starting with rejections and ultimately granting approval on the initial final deadline on May 23, according to Standard Chartered Bank.
